“Chillax lang!” Legal expert assures the public Peter Lim and Kerwin Espinosa not yet off the hook. Watch!

The dismissal of the case by the DOJ against Kerwin Espinosa and Peter Lim has been booed and jeered lustily by critics of President calling it a “fake war on drugs”.

The loudest criticism came from Pnoy’s former Solicitor General, Atty. Florin Hilbay who took to Facebook to write the lines below.

“The DOJ clears, among others:

Peter Lim, a person identified by the President as a drug lord;
Kerwin Espinosa, a self-confessed drug lord;
Peter Co, a convicted drug lord.

And yet, Leila de Lima is still in jail for “conspiracy” to trade in drugs.

This is what you expect from a FAKE WAR ON DRUGS.”

However, it appears that Hilbay’s criticism “lacks sufficient grounds” to borrow the terms used by people who practice the law profession.

So let’s hear the rebuttal of lawyer supporter of President Duterte to Hilbay’s Facebook post.

“Itong ‘LIVE’ na to ginawa ito para di kayo masayado mabahala doon sa pagdismiss ng kaso laban kay Kerwin Espino sa at Peter Lim,” laywer Trixie Cruz Angles stated her purpose of going “live” on Facebook.

“Bakit po?” Atty. Angeles asked.

“Kasi ang dismissal ng kaso ay nangyari dito sa DOJ, hindi po sa hukuman. Kapag sa DOJ po ang dismissal nangyari, wala pong double jeopardy,” Atty. Angeles said.

“Ang ibig sabihin nito? Maaring i-refile ang mga kaso kapag nakalagap ka ng additional evidence. Chillax, it’s not the end of the world! It doesn’t mean that these people are going to get away free. Ang sinasabi lang ng DOJ hindi sufficient ang ebidensya para tumuloy ito sa trial. ” Atty. Angeles assured the public.

“Bakit importante na i-dismiss ng DOJ dito sa preliminary investigation?” Atty. Angeles asked once again.

Here’s Atty. Angeles’ explanation.

“Kasi i-dismiss nila ang kaso pwede pa nila i-continue ang investigation. In fact yun ang nakalagay  sa decision for further investigation. Kapag sinabi ng DOJ for further investigation, it means there is still an opportunity to get more evidence.”

Bakit kailangan dito sa DOJ i-dismiss?

“Kasi kung ituloy ito doon sa korte, tapos ganyan lang ang ebidensya, na hawak, as in yung ebidensya inipresenta dito sa DOJ ang hawak at dadalhin nyo yan sa hukuman? Madidismiss yan!” Madidismiss na, may jeopardy na!” Atty. Angeles insisted.

Ibig sabihin wala ng chance bumalik sa trial and they will get away, they will get away scot-free.

Angeles refuses to blame the DOJ and the PNP but says the PNP did a lousy job in gathering evidence against the accused.

“We are not saying the dismissal is okay , it is not. Nagkamali talaga. So tama din sinasabi ni Atty. Ahmed, hindi ok ito kasi ibig sabihin kulang talaga nung pinafile ang kaso, kulang na doon pa lang kulang ang ebidensya na nilalagak ng PNP.

So kung maiinis tayo, doon tayo sa ano…I don’t like blaming the police for this. Pero kung may tao di na may pagkukulang, ang PNP yun kasi ang nagdedetermine lang ang DOJ.”

Atty. Angeles ended the video asking the public to understand the DOJ. Possibly, they are super-strict on this particular case because if they (DOJ) allow it to proceed to court, the accused may get an acquittal and that is permanent.

“Ganito rin po yun. It’s possible na super-strict ang DOJ on this particular case. Dapat intindihin din natin. If they allow ito na tumuloy dito sa court, baka ma-acquit lang sila and that is permanent.”

You may watch the video below now.



Wag po tayong madadala sa mga MISINFORMATION ng kalaban patungkol sa dismissal ng kaso ni Kerwin Espinosa, Peter Co at Peter Lim. Panoorin ang paliwanag ni Trixie Cruz.SHARE na rin po natin dahil ang mga PROPAGANDISTA ng mga dilaw sa social media ay nagkakalat ng maling impormasyon.

Posted by MOCHA USON BLOG on Monday, March 12, 2018


You thoughts?


Add Comment