Dagdag Bawas 3.0: 2 professors from prestigious schools believe Marcos is a victim of election fraud

An interesting theory has been floating around in the social media claiming that Bongbong Marcos is a victim of “Dagdag Bawas 3.0!”

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

In a Facebook post by David Yap of Ateneo de Manila, the professor uses mathematics to demonstrate the alleged election fraud against Bongbong Marcos.

Professor Yap wrote that for every 40K votes that goes to Bongbong Marcos, 1% of the votes goes to Leni Robredo.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

The same trick was implemented to steal the votes from Chiz Escudero, benefitting the candidate, you know who!

In fairness to the candidate who is benefitting from “Dagdag Bawas 3.0” Professor Yap did not point Robredo as the perpetrator of the high-tech election cheating.

Professor Yap wrote that the cheating occurred around 3AM when everybody is sound asleep.

He added that they cannot use the tool on Mayor Duterte because his lead is just too big to close the gap without raising suspicion.

“They used Leni Robredo as the tool,” Professor Yap adds.

Professor Antonio Contreras from La Salle who teaches Political Science agrees with Professor Yap’s theory that Bongbong Marcos is a victim of sophisticated election cheating, by whom? That remains to be seen.

A netizen made another graphical equation to explain how Marcos lost his votes.

Professor Yap posted it on his timeline and wrote:

Lookie! Someone made a regression equation and put in a best fit line over the decrease in BBM’s lead – almost perfectly linear. Just look at that R-squared value.

My mental math was close – this indicates that it was 44k per 1% (I estimated sir to be 40k per 1%)

Okay for people looking for proof of some hanky panky, read this.

My mathematical side tells me that when increases and decreases in votes that are supposed to be coming randomly from diverse areas in the country with different political preferences become a straight line, then reaches a point where it is reversed, that something might have been programmed.

It is suspicious that transmissions from random points of a highly diverse political landscape behaved like a straight line with an almost perfect fit, as shown by the extremely high R-squares.

What is even highly suspicious is that the straight line is not even of actual votes, but of margins of votes between two candidates.

Note of attribution: I got this graphic from the wall of David Yap courtesy of Mig Barreto Garcia.

Disclosure: I have a mathematical side. I used to teach quantitative analysis and modelling when I was still in UPLB.

What are your thoughts on the cheating theory?

50 Comments

  1. Perla R.Arcilla May 11, 2016
    • Sweetlana Malgoria May 14, 2016
  2. allan May 11, 2016
  3. Rolly Cavan May 11, 2016
    • Marm May 11, 2016
  4. Chloe May 11, 2016
  5. Lazaro Badilla Jr. May 12, 2016
    • samuel May 13, 2016
    • francis May 13, 2016
    • Knightchic May 14, 2016
    • Knightchic May 14, 2016
    • Mayo6 May 14, 2016
  6. Violy Mabanta May 12, 2016
  7. Juanita May 12, 2016
    • Angie Tandico May 12, 2016
      • Sebb Borja May 12, 2016
        • para sa pinas May 14, 2016
        • Knightchic May 14, 2016
        • Lolito U Gapud May 14, 2016
        • Andy May 14, 2016
        • virusdetected May 15, 2016
        • mark percival May 15, 2016
          • SAINT SANTIESTEBAN November 2, 2016
        • SAINT SANTIESTEBAN November 2, 2016
      • roberto May 13, 2016
  8. Larrimar Tia May 12, 2016
    • Rnd May 14, 2016
  9. Albert May 12, 2016
    • Bente May 12, 2016
    • Damuho May 13, 2016
  10. Bell May 12, 2016
    • Knightchic May 14, 2016
  11. Don Vincent B. Busto May 12, 2016
  12. Armour May 12, 2016
  13. bing May 12, 2016
  14. Ben Leano May 12, 2016
    • gary May 14, 2016
  15. imgonzalez May 12, 2016
  16. Hart May 12, 2016
  17. Giannis May 12, 2016
  18. Phoebe Friedlander May 12, 2016
    • rks May 14, 2016
    • Nina Garcia May 15, 2016
  19. ER May 12, 2016
  20. Ariel fuentebella May 12, 2016
    • francis May 13, 2016
  21. gary May 14, 2016
  22. rks May 14, 2016
  23. Demetrio L. Buenavista Jr. May 14, 2016
  24. Nina Garcia May 15, 2016

Add Comment