La Salle History prof teaches lawyer Florin Hilbay on rules of court re Duterte making public admission on ejk

Embarrassing when a lawyer is being lectured by a non-lawyer on something that they are expect to be experts.

Even more embarrassing when a former Solicitor General and bar topnotcher like Florin Hilbay is being lectured by a mere professor whose expertise is Philippine history.

In case you missed it, Hilbay alerted International Criminal Court on Pres. Duterte making public admission that his only crime is ejk, telling them to do it quick, meaning the case against President Duterte that his LP allies have filed before the International Tribunal.

Dear International Criminal Court – ICC

Here’s the President of the Republic of the Philippines, making a public admission of crimes under your jurisdiction.

Please act asap.
Thank you.

However, La Salle History professor Van Ybiernas quickly doused water on Hilbay’s enthusiasm and positivism by lecturing the former SolGen why Duterte’s mere admission is inadmissible in court.

He even made fun of the opposition supporters who gloated at the prospect that PRRD will be convicted using his public admission on ejk.

May bago na namang “explosive” quote si Duterte, yung umamin siya na kasalanan nya yung mga EJK.

Dagsaan na naman ang mga tangang anti-Duterte sa quote na yan. (Pasok Larry Gadon!)

Look, people would like to think you can send someone to jail because they supposedly admitted to a crime. BUT IT’S NOT THAT SIMPLE.

Hindi po hahatulan o kahit na kakasuhan ANG LAHAT o SINUMAN na umamin sa isang krimen.

May isang gago diyan, halimbawa, umamin na sampung beses nya ginahasa ang magandang si Liza Soberano. Ano, aarestuhin at kakasuhan agad?

Pasok ulit, Larry Gadon!

HINDI SAPAT (minsan) ANG PAG-AMIN PARA KASUHAN ANG ISANG TAO. Kailangan may corroborating evidence ka.

Ngayon, sino sa mga pulis ang aamin na involved sila sa EJK? Baka meron umamin KUNG gagawin silang state witness. Pero, mag-state witness ka laban sa pangulo? (Pasok ulit Larry Gadon)

Sinong Public Prosecutor ang mag-o-offer sa isang pulis na mag-state witness laban sa pangulo. (Larry Gadon, alam mo na gagawin mo!)

At kahit meron pang tumestigo at gawin nga ng DoJ na state witness, kailangan patunayan nya pa na nabigyan siya ng pangulo ng instructions.

E paano kung sabihing kahit hindi nga na-meet ng pulis si Duterte nang personal ay sumunod na lang siya sa instructions ng pangulo sa mga public speeches nito? Sa tingin mo may korteng tatanggap ng ganitong pang-gagong argumento? Gadon, pasok!

Hindi magagamit sa korte ang sinasabi ng pangulo! Magagamit lang yan sa bar of public opinion. Eh pota! kaya nga binoto ng taumbayan si Duterte ay dahil nangako nga ng “Patayen! Obosen!” (EJK kung gusto nyo!)

Paanong magagalit ang publiko sa pangulo dahil sa pag-amin na ito e yan nga ang gusto ng botante?

Gadoooooooooooooooon, kailangan kita sa huling pagkakataon! Pasoooooooooooooooook!

Your reaction?

Loading...

Add Comment