Netizen blasts lawyer who called SAF 44 case reopening a political move, a cover-up for ‘tokhang for ransom’ issue

An LP associated lawyer described the reopening of the SAF 44 case as a political move to distract from the issue of ‘tokhang for ransom’ against PNP.

The lawyer, Atty. Jesus Falcis published his reaction on Facebook on Tuesday, 5:21 PM.

This looks like a political move to distract from the issue of PNP’s tokhang for ransom and a signal to resurrect a closed and exhaustive investigation.

Unless Duterte has new evidence or information about what happened then, this is politicking at its finest.

Evil genius political move for him, unhelpful and harmful move for police accountability in tokhangs for ransom. Duterte wins, the Filipino people loses.

Netizen RG San Luis, a vocal Duterte supporter in the social media reacted to Atty. Falcis’s comment that reads:

Dapat pag abogado ka magaling ka sa logic kasi facts ang pinag-uusapan. 6,000 Drug related deaths extra-judicial killings ang claim ni Atty. Falsificado. Pero pag napatay ang 44 SAF dahil sa katangahan ng dating Pangulong pinanganak na tanga, politicking. Kung kahulugan ng buhay ng tao ang ipinaglalaban mo, di ba dapat mas galit ka na napatay ang mga inosente kaisa sa mga taong ang gawain ay manakit ng kapwa nila? Dapat to hindi na Jesus Falcis. Dapat Facifica Falsificado na. Disipulo yata to ni Andy Botedaya sa Comelec. Hindi raw siya ang dapat managot sa hacking sa Comelec voter database. Yung hacker daw. Kung ganitong uri ng guro sa kolehiyo ngayon patay na ang mga susunod na henerasyon.

Netizens also reacts on Atty. Falcis’s assertion and shared their opinion on the comment’s section.

“Closed? Ninoy-Galman nga may Agrava na, may Sandigan pa. Pwede pa ngang buksan uli,” Edgar Jordan wrote.

“Falsification of the truth ang specialty ni Falcis,” Andel Jung chided Atty. Falcis.

“In other words mukhang gusto ni facifica falsificado na sabihan ang mga kaanak ng SAF44 na mag move on na lang,” Mary Michelle remarked.

What say you in this issue? Please comment your reaction below.

Loading...

Add Comment