Very witty! Fearless netizen pits Atty. Erin Tanada’s statement re Bikoy & WPP vs Robredo, De Lima & Trillanes on Bikoy

In case you missed it, Atty. Erin Tanada’s said Bikoy isn’t qualified for the WPP (Witness Protection Program) because he was convicted of a crime involving moral turpitude.

Well, that argument of Tanada has already been answered and demolished by DDS lawyer Trixie Cruz-Angeles, right? [Link here]

Meanwhile, Tanada, who is one of the prominent LP personalities, appears to have developed amnesia or not paying attention to his LP friends on the Bikoy issue.

While Tanada believed Bikoy should be admitted to the WPP, Robredo, de Lima and Trillanes think otherwise.

On that note, international trade expert MJ Quiambao Reyes has taken to Facebook to remind Tanada, in case he forgot what Robredo, de Lima and Trillanes said when Bikoy first came out to expose the alleged involvement of members of the Duterte family with the Chinese dr^g syndicate.

Robredo said that Bikoy should be admitted to the witness protection program because he was like a whistle-blower.

De Lima echoed Robredo’s statement that Bikoy can be considered as a whistle-blower, hence he needs to be protected.

Meanwhile, Trillanes praised Bikoy for the videos linking the Duterte’s to the illegal dr^g trade. Said the accusations are very serious, well-pointed and explained.

You may read MJ Reyes full FB post below.

TO MR. TAÑADA:

In case you’re unaware, it was your very own LP leader, Mrs. Robredo, who first wanted witness protection for Bikoy. 😉

MRS. ROBREDO ON BIKOY (May 2, 2019):

Di ba dapat bigyan ng witness protection, parang whistle-blower din sya.”

LEILA DE LIMA:

“Seryosohin dapat ng awtoridad si ‘Bikoy’. Hindi biro ang panganib na sinuong at haharapin pa nya at ng kanyang pamilya para lamang mailabas ang impormasyong hawak nya.”

TRILLANES:

“First of all, let me congratulate the people behind the videos that linked the Duterte family to illegal drugs! The accusations of the witness were very serious, quite pointed and well-explained.”

***

Your comment?

Add Comment