#Desperado! Atty. Mans Morales reacts to Trillanes’ accusation: He is just a desperate rumor mongerer who happens to be a Senator

After unsuccessfully dragging Paolo Duterte’s BOC smuggling, Sen. Trillanes has turned his attention to Mans Morales, Pres. Duterte’s son-in-law.

Trillanes accused Mans Morales of wrongdoing after a former Intelligence officer from the Bureau of Customers mentioned he saw Atty. Morales visited the office of former BOC Chief Nic Faeldon five times. [Link here]

“They don’t have any business with the Bureau of Customs except mag-aano talaga sila, mag-exert ng influence at nag-eendorse sila ng mga tao. So ganun yan eh. Very sensitive yang Customs. Pag-member ka ng isang influential family, in this case, they are the first family. Then stay away from that area!”

Atty. Mans Morales, Sara Duterte’s husband took to Facebook defending himself from Trillanes malicious allegation, calling Trillanes attempt to drag his name in the BOC scandal as desperate.

“I represent many clients who have transactions with the Bureau of Customs. It is my job as a lawyer to appear before government agencies for and on behalf of my principals. Senator Trillanes is imputing malice in saying that my appearance before the BOC is because of smuggling. He is just a desperate rumor mongerer who happens to be a Senator.#desperado”

Netizens express their support to Atty. Mans Morales in the comment section.

Lino Lim wrote: “Sir you dont have to defend yourself from that piece of shit trillanes, he’s all fart…..Take care po.”

Lalaine Manuel simply laugh at Trillanes latest antics. “dyan sya magaling..sa pag gawa ng istorya..paano trabaho nila cguro noon..lahat na lng idinadawit nya..bueahahaha”

Bae Con remarked: “Who believes a guy who’s source can only be confirm by speaking to Casper. “

Mary Prado Costello wrote: “No need to explain yourself with that dumbshit. Kung lahat Ng government personalities or any humankind na pumasok sa boc ay sangkot sa smuggling, naman, sobrang ipokrito naman nya.”

Totoy Komes said: “This clearly shows that Trillanes has no ‘solid piece of evidence’ against the Dutertes.

Kung merong concrete evidence yan si Trillanes, matagal ng nakasampa sa korte at sasakyan ng yellows.

Wala eh. Bitlog!

Kaya, Trillanes resorted to chismis at hearsays..”

Your thoughts?

Add Comment