Election lawyer deals another blow to Robredo’s legitimacy, poses hard questions to PNoy re: authenticity of Robredo’s voters

Several news headlines ago, President Duterte said that he will only step down if a Marcos or Escudero was his successor.

The Robredo camp and her LP allies did not let this Duterte statement passed without publicly admonishing the President to follow the law of succession according to the Constitution.

Ex-President Pnoy, who chose to lie low from politics after stepping down from office, momentarily ended his self-imposed exile and issued a statement to reprimand PRRD, reminding him about respecting the people who voted for Robredo.

Election reform crusader Glenn Chong couldn’t help but speaks in behalf of PRRD to respond to Pnoy’s sermoning the President about respecting Robredo’s voters.

On Facebook, Chong posed the hard questions to Pnoy. For example, “how many really voted for Robredo? and the official tally of Robredo’s votes did come from real voters?”

Chong then went on to dismantle Pnoy’s illusion that Robredo’s win over Marcos was legitimate.

In the 2016 election, the so-called ‘riding-in-team’ (Smartmatic and Comelec) pulled off the almost perfect crime in the history of automated election in the Philippines and perhaps in the whole world which Chong illustrated below using a meme.

Chong joked that Smartmatic’s vote counting machines think in advance, votes were already tallied even before the machines from the precincts started transmitting the results.

Chong based his accusation as reflected in the timestamps of data logs of the VCM’s and the Transparency servers.

Chong pointed out that 10 of these precincts with discrepancies were notably from Naga City, Robredo’s bailiwick.

Chong dismissed Smartmatic and Comelec’s alibi that these discrepancies were encountered because the VCMs and Transparency servers internal clock were not synchronized.

Read the Chong’s explanation below.

ADVANCED MAG-ISIP ANG MGA MAKINA NG SMARTMATIC (May boto ng na tally kahit di pa nagpadala ang makina sa presinto ng resluta)

Ayon kay Noynoy Aquino, dapat igalang ni Pangulong Duterte ang mga botanteng bumoto kay Leni Robredo.

Ang tanong – ilang botante ba ang bumoto kay Leni Robredo? Makakasiguro ba tayo na ang official tally ng kanyang boto na iniluwa ng mga makina ay galing sa mga totoong botante?

Silipin nating muli ang mga presinto mula sa Naga City, baluwarte ni Leni Robredo. Ayon sa audit logs, may 10 presinto kung saan mas nauna pang natanggap ng Transparency Server na hawak ng PPCRV ang resulta ng halalan bago pa man magpadala ng kani-kanilang resulta ang 10 makinang ito. Advanced mag-isip ang Transparency Server ng PPCRV!

Ang transmission ng resulta ng halalan ay tulad ng pagpapadala ng text message. Ang voting machine sa presinto ang sender. Ang canvassing system tulad ng Transparency Server naman ang receiver. Tulad ng cellphone, may message details sa sender at receiver sa bawat text na ipinapadala at tinatanggap ng cellphone. Ganito rin ang voting machine at Transparency Server.

Ang audit logs ng mga voting machines at Transparency Server ang naglalaman ng message details ng bawat resultang ipinapadala at tinatanggap. Dito natin makikita ang mga anomalya at iregularidad na malinaw na palatandaan ng dayaan sa halalan.

Sa 10 presintong ito, mas nauna pang natanggap ng receiver na Transparency Server ang text o resulta ng halalan bago pa man ito ipinadala ng sender na voting machine.

Ang palusot ng riding in tandem (Comelec + Smartmatic) plus lookout (PPCRV) ay hindi nagkatugma ang orasan ng mga voting machines at canvassing systems tulad ng Transparency Server kaya lumalabas ang ganitong sitwasyon.

Ito rin ang nangyari noong 2010. Katunayan, sa Biliran, 8 canvassing systems ang nagtala sa audit logs na natanggap nila ang mga resulta mula sa 52 voting machines bago pa man magpadala ng resulta ang lahat ng 52 voting machines na ito. Panahon pa ni Noynoy Aquino, advanced na sila mag-isip!

Maaring paniwalaan ang palusot ng sindikato noong 2010. Pero hindi na ito maaring paniwalaan ngayon dahil sa 2016 elections, nagkaroon na ng date and time diagnostics ang bawat isang voting machines at canvassing systems na hindi ginawa noong 2010 elections.

Samakatuwid, dahil sa date and time diagnostics, dapat ay nagkatugma o nagsynchronize na ang lahat ng voting machines at canvassing systems.

Kaya kung lumabas man ang sitwasyong ito sa 2016 elections, ito ay dahil may mga clone o pekeng voting machines na nagpapadala ng pekeng resulta at inuunahan ang totoo at lehitimong voting machines sa presinto. Kung sino man ang naunang magpadala ng resulta, iyon ang tatanggapin ng canvassing system tulad ng Transparency Server. Ang late na resulta ay balewala na.

Tandaan, may 459 presinto na nagpadala na ng resulta isang araw bago ang halalan noong 2016. Dahil nga, inuunahan na ng clone o pekeng voting machines ang mga totoo at lehitimong voting machines sa mga presinto.

Kung ganito ang makikita natin mula sa baluwarte ni Leni Robredo, sinong botante ang dapat igalang ni Pangulong Duterte gayong clone o pekeng voting machine lang naman pala ang nagpadala ng resulta?

As of this writing, Chong’s FB post has generated 6,502 shares, 3,616 reactions and 505 comments.

Your reaction?

Add Comment